So, results came out today.
I guess you're going to want to know how I did right?
You're going to have to keep scrolling.
Click here to find out:
Friday, 13 June 2008
Wednesday, 4 June 2008
Because a) I've got nothing better to do, b) I quite enjoy it and c) the £40 will pay for a takeaway, today I volunteered yet again as a patient for the 3rd year OSCE exam. It is the 5th or sixth time I've done so but each time I learn something new about the whole process. Today I had aortic regurgitation and 39 candidates did their best to impress the examiner as I laid there watching the ducks out of the window.
Now I should say that I think OSCEs are a very important assessment of a medical student's abilities. However, they aren't, certainly at my institution assessed effectively in my opinion. I recognise the difficulties in running a fair exam but when you're trying to do so simultaneously at 4 sites, with different equipment and different examiners in the morning and afternoon but supposedly the same stations it must be impossible! You might think that it all averages out in the end, and perhaps it does eventually but there are huge inconsistencies. I would have thought some methods are employed in an effort to standardise the marks but it would be almost impossible to do this for every conceivable variable. Blah, blah, blah, I could moan about this all day long.
Lets take today for example, admittedly I only saw a snap-shot of what went on, just 1 out of 13 or 14 stations. We started in the morning with one examiner, who's marking was rather erratic. There was one student who was a country mile above the rest who scored average to below average whereas others who were average at best were scoring higher. It doesn't help that the mark scheme leaves things very open to interpretation by the examiner but what can you do? An open mark scheme is too open to subjectivity but a more rigid mark scheme makes it more difficult for students to score consistently. Overall that examiner was fairly generous. In the afternoon, same station, different examiner. This time, a much more consistent marker but at the same time, much harsher with the marks (perhaps rightly so). Next we should consider the students, frankly, overall they weren't that great but I'll get to that in a minute. For no particular reason that I could see there was a significant variation between the morning lot and afternoon lot. The morning lot were on the whole, ok (remember they also had a generous marker) whereas the afternoon lot were, apart from one, not as good (and also had a harsher marker). I might not have explained that too well but what I'm getting at is that there was more than one variable affecting each group skewing the distribution of marks further between morning and afternoon.
As for the students themselves, let me explain what I thought was wrong. This might sound a little harsh and hypocritical (I was exactly the same when I was a 3rd year). Neither is it really the students fault. Every student was able to make a decent effort at completing a cardiovascular examination. But, you could teach a monkey to do a textbook cardiovascular examination. Very few students looked like they were actually looking to elicit signs. Perhaps the main issue here is that it is such a fake situation and the students are expecting a normal volunteer to examine therefore there won't be any signs so it doesn't matter. I spoke to the examiner about this and he agreed, he had previously examined a thyroid station where students had all done a textbook examination but 5cm above where the thyroid actually is. They are only 3rd years, perhaps it is unfair to expect them to elicit signs at such an early stage. You can clearly tell the students who've examined real patients and who are actually trying to elicit the signs from those who are just going through the motions, the former group generally score higher, I believe rightly so.
During finals for instance we had 6 stations of real patients, these were not only the most difficult but were the most interesting and dare I say it, enjoyable stations from my point of view. Why not have a few real patients for earlier years? Yes, it would take more organisation but patients are usually quite willing to spend a morning being examined. We're not trying to train monkeys, we're trying to train competent, dynamic doctors who're able to think on their feet so why aren't we assessing this properly?
My experience of OSCEs from both sides has led me to the following conclusion:
Performance = 30% luck in each and every station + 30% examiner subjectivity + 30% confidence (or false confidence) + 10% knowledge
Clearly, luck makes up a rather large proportion and this is what needs to be eradicated if possible. How we do this I'm not quite sure. Perhaps having more stations 30, 40 (as some other medical schools do I believe) to average things out, or improving the consistency of marking by reducing the subjectivity.
I love to get my hands on a chunk of results data to run some of my own statistical analysis on. Although the chances of that happening are about the same as winning the lottery.... 4 times. If I asked for it, I'd just be ignored.... again.
One other thing from today; what is with all the all black stethoscopes? At least half the students had them and yes they might look quite cool but they sure as hell don't make you any better at using them!
If you've not already done so check out my latest, and probably final post here: http://thereallm.blogspot.com/
Sunday, 1 June 2008
After 5 years at university accruing several tens of thousand pounds of debt I suppose it should come as no surprise that the final few weeks are full of costly expenses. I suppose I should get used to it, things are only going to get worse, I should really count my lucky stars that I didn't have to pay to sit my final exams.
Among the expenses, GMC provisional registration (£135), MDU (£20 approx), graduation robes (£37) was a colourful leaflet from the BMA listing all the potential benefits of being a BMA member as an F1. I am a student BMA member and enjoy my regular sBMJ so I figured I'd probably keep my membership up as an F1. I looked all the way through this colourful leaflet and couldn't find anywhere how much its going to cost me, something tells me it won't be cheap.
Becoming a doctor has always been an expensive process but it really doesn't come at the best of times towards the end of student life.
Perhaps, rather than medical school I should taken up a life renting graduation robes. Lets do some maths. So my graduation robes are going to cost me (well, hopefully my parents) £37 to rent for a couple of hours. There will be over 400 people graduating from the medical school alone, that is the best part of £15,000. Multiply that up for all the students graduating throughout the country and I'm fairly sure it will come to a very substantial amount.
Whilst I've got my chequebook out, who's next?
Friday, 23 May 2008
Wow, its now a week after my last exam. Doesn't time fly when you're having fun or, in my case doing bugger all.
What exactly have I done in the last week? Well, not a great deal really. My post-exam to-do list which was already as long as my left arm hasn't been reduced and now in fact stretches around my back and down my right arm too. Saying that I have been 'busy', after all I must have been too busy to blog right? Well, yeah, but then again, I've not had a great deal to blog about. There is only so much material one can get out of waking up, playing computer games, eating and sleeping.
My main objective for the week involved a great deal of football manager, for those of you who know, I need say nothing more. For the rest of you, it's a totally addictive, virtual football manager PC game, like a boy's version of sims according to missbliss. I also got a new gadget on Tuesday and have spent many an hour playing with it, and i've not even read the mahousive instruction manual yet (by far the most exciting part) and yes, every single page is in English - no being disappointed when 5/6ths of the book is in Japanese/German/etc etc.
Yesterday, an excursion took us to the hospital I'll hopefully be working at come August. It was the first time I'd been there, and the first time I'd even been to the city in question. The city is lovely, if slightly quieter and more serene than what I'm used to. The hospital reminds me of a hospital some of my clinical placements were at. It is relatively small, seems mainly modern, and has a few odd, but rather cool quirks. We went for a wander round, obviously to scope out the important places, those being a) the shop, b) the cafes and c) the chocolate machines, all of which, I'm pleased to say, were up to standard.
This week has gone ridiculously quickly, perhaps I should be grateful after all that we have to wait a month for results! Hopefully next week, I'll be able to tick a few things off my to-do list.
Saturday, 17 May 2008
Yes ladies and gentlemen, it is over. My last exam on Friday went ok, it was certainly better than Monday's. I broke my rule of "never change your first answer" and that cost me a couple of marks I think but on the whole it was OK.
As I'm moving out of deanery I don't have to do my shadowing period now, in fact, I don't have to do it until the week before I start my job. This means that I'm now free, free to do whatever I want until the end of July!
I am now in a strange sense of limbo, I don't know what I am. I have a whole month to wait until results. Don't even get me started on that... honestly, how long does it take to put all the multiple choice papers in a scanner?
Hopefully I'll be able put results out of my mind and just enjoy my free time, sadly, I don't think it'll be that easy for some.
Thursday, 15 May 2008
So now everyone has done their OSCE, I think I’m ok to talk about what came up. Especially as the information will be freely available here in a couple of weeks time. I’d advise anyone sitting finals to register and take a look at the section where feedback has been collected from students who’ve sat finals in the past few years at most of the medical schools in the country.
OSLERS – 15 minutes history/5 minutes discussion
This wasn’t too bad; I’m not entirely sure what type of history you’re supposed to take from someone who has had their diagnosis for 30 years. It’s more of a chat about their condition than anything I hope. You’re supposed to consult with them for 15 minutes and then tell the examiner what you think their diagnosis is. Now for some things this is easier than others. It sort of gives it away when the patient tells you their diagnosis (I don’t think they’re supposed to do that). When you’ve finished the history, there is a 5 minute period for questions. The examiner was a little mean and impatient but I think I did ok.
This was harder than the other OSLER, mainly because it wasn’t barn door MS. At first I thought it could be MND, then I thought it was some weird myasthenia problem but I eventually did decide it was MS (mainly because when I asked if he saw any specialist nurses – he told me he’d seen the MS nurse before). Again I think I did ok with the history part and managed to waffle my way through most of the questions.
5 Minute ‘Spotter’ Stations
A strange station really, I was told to purely inspect a patient’s leg and not to examine it. There was an obvious amputation and slightly deformed ankle, I wasn’t entirely sure what else I was supposed to see/say. I guessed it was charcot’s joint and the examiner seemed quite pleased. I was able to answer most of the questions quite well too.
Not the most of obvious of Parkinson’s, must have been pretty well controlled on medication. I found that the patient had increased tone but I thought it was spasticity rather than the typical rigidity of Parkinson’s. I did spot the shuffling gait and managed to reel off and demonstrate a number of other tests for Parkinson’s.
Probably my best station. I was asked to inspect a patient’s abdomen, he had an obvious stoma. The rest of the station was questions. I managed to answer them all confidently and completely. We finished in about 3 minutes and spent 3 minutes talking about politics.
Another barn door diagnosis, I was slightly unsure what to examine in terms of the patient’s hand, but the station was mostly question based and I think I coped with them pretty well.
What annoyed me most about this station was the examiner; I felt she was rather mean. I managed to spot the diagnosis of psoriasis and answer the questions well, if not perfectly but the examiner still didn’t seem particularly happy for some reason. Maybe she was bored as it was my last station and she’d been there all day long
The only 5 minute station I really didn’t like. I was asked to examine a patient’s heart. I was told to go straight to auscultation and at first couldn’t even tell whether or not the patient even had a heart. When I finally found it, I could hear an obvious murmur and I tried to time it with the pulse and decided it was a diastolic murmur. I then decided that it was loudest in the tricuspid area and so decided on a diagnosis of tricuspid stenosis. God knows why, patients with that must be as rare as hen’s teeth. Anyway, the examiner told me that it was in-fact systolic and atrial stenoisis. Oops! I managed to answer the questions though so I’m hoping that brought my mark up for that station.
10 minute stations
I made such a hash of this potentially easy station. It is because I was told to go straight to the abdomen. If I’d had to examine the whole system it would have been the easiest station of the lot. Anyway, the ‘patient’ was simulating that she was in a lot of pain which put me off completely. I didn’t want to cause her any more pain by examining her. I royally fucked up the order of my examination but did eventually mention most things in a haphazard manner. I gave a decent differential diagnosis and mentioned just about every possible test under the sun.
This was my first station, and I was well chuffed. It was a nice easy start. I’m pretty sure I had my testicle examination down to a fine art. And apart from a question on the cause of painless epididymitis, I also did quite well with the questions.
Hearing tests and hearing aid viva
I wasn’t impressed with the examiner in this station. I knew exactly what I had to do and I had it perfectly clear in my head about Rinne's and Weber's tests. Unfortunately the examiner decided to take me round in circles and completely confused me by twisting what I’d said. Anyway, I managed to get the other questions right so I’m hoping to have only dropped a mark for getting slightly confused.
Diabetes – Driving DVLA
My worst station, I didn’t have the faintest idea about diabetes and driving. The scenario was; “a patient has come for his routine diabetes check-up”, here was me expecting to have to examine him but no. He had actually come to ask about driving as he’d just got a new job. Would he have to tell work and the DVLA about his diabetes? I didn’t know, I said I’d have to look up the details but I told him to notify the DVLA and encouraged him to tell work. I don’t think he as the patient was particularly pleased with the outcome of our discussion so god knows what the examiner thought. Here’s hoping I got a mark for washing my hands.
Child psych – mother concerned about daughter losing weight
I haven’t a clue how I did in this station because I’ve no idea what it required us to do. It was difficult to take a history from the mother as third person but I got in most of the important questions. I presented a decent differential diagnosis and made a vague effort to explain to the mum about the possibility of anorexia.
Explaining bad news and consenting a schizophrenic with cancer
This station had come up before, just as the other scenarios I asked about had. Again I’ve no idea what was expect of us and how I did depends entirely on what the mark scheme asked for. The simulated patient who kept hearing voices during my consultation first of all declined surgery but was happy to consider it by discussing with his parents by the time we’d finished so that has to be a good thing. I think he had capacity but I found it difficult to get this point across to the examiner who didn’t say a word to me throughout the whole station apart from “you have 10 minutes to use as you please” as I asked her a question.
Hope I did OK in this station, in hindsight (AKA talking to missbliss) I could have done better but at the time I think I mentioned most things that I needed to. My mind went blank with regards to the side effects but I remembered the other things. The simulated patient was annoying in that she kept asking me questions about things I’d already told her about, but I suppose that made her an accurate patient!
One of my better stations, don’t think this was too challenging though I think I spelt pneumonia wrong. They were sneaky in trying to catch us out with a particular detail which I wasn’t sure about but said I could check. I was able to answer most of the examiner’s questions. There was a fair amount of spare time in this station during which I sat there like a numpty trying desperately to think of more answers to the questions.
So there you have it, 5 years of medical school condensed into 2 hours 40 minutes.
4 weeks to wait to find out whether or not I passed.
Wednesday, 14 May 2008
Following a rather disastrous start to my finals on Monday(although it seems most people feel the same), yesterday was the OSCE. This is the big one, the most important one, the one everyone is most worried about. I'm usually quite calm around exam time but OSCEs bring out the nerves in even the calmest of us.
It is the waiting that annoys me most, we reported to the hospital about 12, only to be forced to sit and wait for an unknown period of time, a period where minutes feel like hours. I imagine it is like waiting for an execution, only at least with that you know what is going to happen, with an OSCE, you never know if you'll come out dead or alive! In that final hour, some nervously flick through their notes aiming to cram those final few facts, others sit calmly contemplating what is to come. Only when we had to put all our belongings in quarantine did the reality of the situation hit me, I don't often get butterflies in my tummy but at that point yesterday a swarm of them descended upon me. I defy anyone to sit an OSCE without feeling those nerves. When we were finally marched upstairs and given a short briefing I knew this was it, 3 hours that could make or break my future.
Placed outside the first station by an unfamiliar but friendly face, I could feel my heart beating, in fact, it felt like it was about to explode. The time had come, my body responding with its fight or flight mechanism. As tempting as it was to run out of the door and never look back, my thoughts were interrupted by the first buzzer and the fight began.....
That I'm afraid is where the story must end for today. I will write about each station but as other students still have to sit the OSCE I don't think it would be a good idea to talk about it till Thursday.
All I will say is that it could have been much worse...
Just Friday to go.